-
由 Razvan Pascanu 提交于
Issue : scan used to compute something, that I thought was the R-op with respect to shared variables with updates of the inner function. After more reflection, I think those numbers I'm computing have no meaning .. Unless the user asks explicitly for the R_op with respect to some value that is a shared variable, this would not affect anything (just some extra computations). The reason I removed them is not only the possible meaningless of these numbers, but also the fact that R_op methods are not defined for random number sampling function, which would appear as shared variable. So you would get that you can not compute the R-op because some function is not defined for that op, even though that is only to compute some values you don't care and which might not have any meaning. I have no idea exactly how to test this, since is not a bug per-se is more of a semanting error in my understanding of what the R-op is suppose to do.
001185db