Skip to content
项目
群组
代码片段
帮助
当前项目
正在载入...
登录 / 注册
切换导航面板
P
pytensor
项目
项目
详情
活动
周期分析
仓库
仓库
文件
提交
分支
标签
贡献者
图表
比较
统计图
议题
0
议题
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
合并请求
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
流水线
作业
日程
统计图
Wiki
Wiki
代码片段
代码片段
成员
成员
折叠边栏
关闭边栏
活动
图像
聊天
创建新问题
作业
提交
问题看板
Open sidebar
testgroup
pytensor
Commits
298731cb
提交
298731cb
authored
9月 16, 2012
作者:
Ian Goodfellow
浏览文件
操作
浏览文件
下载
电子邮件补丁
差异文件
added some attempts at doc
上级
102c0c0d
隐藏空白字符变更
内嵌
并排
正在显示
1 个修改的文件
包含
26 行增加
和
2 行删除
+26
-2
destroyhandler.py
theano/gof/destroyhandler.py
+26
-2
没有找到文件。
theano/gof/destroyhandler.py
浏览文件 @
298731cb
...
...
@@ -16,8 +16,21 @@ class ProtocolError(Exception):
"""WRITEME"""
pass
class
DestroyHandler
(
object
):
"""WRITEME"""
class
DestroyHandler
(
toolbox
.
Feature
):
"""WRITEME
The DestroyHandler is never constructed anywhere except as an argument to
FunctionGraph.attach_feature.
TODO: What does the DestroyHandler actually do?
TODO: should the DestroyHandler even exist? It is only constructed to be passed
to on_attach, and once it is passed there, it does nothing but make a DestroyHandlerHelper2.
all it does is add a layer of indirection; all the DestroyHandler callbacks
just lookup which DestroyHandlerHelper2 object to route the callback through to
TODO: Sometimes FunctionGraph has more than one DestroyHandler as a feature,
is this a bug?
"""
def
__init__
(
self
,
do_imports_on_attach
=
True
):
self
.
map
=
{}
...
...
@@ -214,6 +227,11 @@ def _contains_cycle(fgraph, orderings):
def
getroot
(
r
,
view_i
):
"""
TODO: what is view_i ? based on add_impact's docstring, IG is guessing
it might be a dictionary mapping variables to views, but what is
a view? In these old docstrings I'm not sure if "view" always
means "view variable" or if it also sometimes means "viewing
pattern."
For views: Return non-view variable which is ultimatly viewed by r.
For non-views: return self.
"""
...
...
@@ -229,6 +247,12 @@ def add_impact(r, view_o, impact):
:param impact: is a set of variables that are views of r
:param droot: a dictionary mapping views -> r
TODO: this docstring is hideously wrong, the function doesn't return anything.
has droot been renamed to view_o?
does it add things to the impact argument instead of returning them?
IG thinks so, based on reading the code. It looks like get_impact
does what this docstring said this function does.
"""
for
v
in
view_o
.
get
(
r
,[]):
impact
.
add
(
v
)
...
...
编写
预览
Markdown
格式
0%
重试
或
添加新文件
添加附件
取消
您添加了
0
人
到此讨论。请谨慎行事。
请先完成此评论的编辑!
取消
请
注册
或者
登录
后发表评论