Skip to content
项目
群组
代码片段
帮助
当前项目
正在载入...
登录 / 注册
切换导航面板
P
pytensor
项目
项目
详情
活动
周期分析
仓库
仓库
文件
提交
分支
标签
贡献者
图表
比较
统计图
议题
0
议题
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
合并请求
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
流水线
作业
日程
统计图
Wiki
Wiki
代码片段
代码片段
成员
成员
折叠边栏
关闭边栏
活动
图像
聊天
创建新问题
作业
提交
问题看板
Open sidebar
testgroup
pytensor
Commits
492653e9
提交
492653e9
authored
9月 16, 2012
作者:
Ian Goodfellow
浏览文件
操作
浏览文件
下载
电子邮件补丁
差异文件
started IncrementalDestroyHandler class
上级
cda264aa
隐藏空白字符变更
内嵌
并排
正在显示
1 个修改的文件
包含
363 行增加
和
1 行删除
+363
-1
destroyhandler.py
theano/gof/destroyhandler.py
+363
-1
没有找到文件。
theano/gof/destroyhandler.py
浏览文件 @
492653e9
...
...
@@ -241,7 +241,368 @@ def fast_inplace_check(inputs):
and
i
not
in
protected_inputs
]
return
inputs
class
DestroyHandler
(
toolbox
.
Bookkeeper
):
if
0
:
# old, non-incremental version of the DestroyHandler
class
DestroyHandler
(
toolbox
.
Bookkeeper
):
"""
The DestroyHandler class detects when a graph is impossible to evaluate because of
aliasing and destructive operations.
Several data structures are used to do this.
When an Op uses its view_map property to declare that an output may be aliased
to an input, then if that output is destroyed, the input is also considering to be
destroyed. The view_maps of several Ops can feed into one another and form a directed graph.
The consequence of destroying any variable in such a graph is that all variables in the graph
must be considered to be destroyed, because they could all be refering to the same
underlying storage. In the current implementation, that graph is a tree, and the root of
that tree is called the foundation. The `droot` property of this class maps from every
graph variable to its foundation. The `impact` property maps backward from the foundation
to all of the variables that depend on it. When any variable is destroyed, this class marks
the foundation of that variable as being destroyed, with the `root_destroyer` property.
"""
droot
=
{}
"""
destroyed view + nonview variables -> foundation
"""
impact
=
{}
"""
destroyed nonview variable -> it + all views of it
"""
root_destroyer
=
{}
"""
root -> destroyer apply
"""
def
__init__
(
self
,
do_imports_on_attach
=
True
):
self
.
fgraph
=
None
self
.
do_imports_on_attach
=
do_imports_on_attach
def
on_attach
(
self
,
fgraph
):
"""
When attaching to a new fgraph, check that
1) This DestroyHandler wasn't already attached to some fgraph
(its data structures are only set up to serve one)
2) The FunctionGraph doesn't already have a DestroyHandler.
This would result in it validating everything twice, causing
compilation to be slower.
TODO: WRITEME: what does this do besides the checks?
"""
####### Do the checking ###########
already_there
=
False
if
self
.
fgraph
is
fgraph
:
already_there
=
True
if
self
.
fgraph
is
not
None
:
raise
Exception
(
"A DestroyHandler instance can only serve one FunctionGraph. (Matthew 6:24)"
)
for
attr
in
(
'destroyers'
,
'destroy_handler'
):
if
hasattr
(
fgraph
,
attr
):
already_there
=
True
if
already_there
:
# FunctionGraph.attach_feature catches AlreadyThere and cancels the attachment
raise
toolbox
.
AlreadyThere
(
"DestroyHandler feature is already present or in conflict with another plugin."
)
####### end of checking ############
def
get_destroyers_of
(
r
):
droot
,
impact
,
root_destroyer
=
self
.
refresh_droot_impact
()
try
:
return
[
root_destroyer
[
droot
[
r
]]]
except
Exception
:
return
[]
fgraph
.
destroyers
=
get_destroyers_of
fgraph
.
destroy_handler
=
self
self
.
fgraph
=
fgraph
self
.
destroyers
=
set
()
#set of Apply instances with non-null destroy_map
self
.
view_i
=
{}
# variable -> variable used in calculation
self
.
view_o
=
{}
# variable -> set of variables that use this one as a direct input
#clients: how many times does an apply use a given variable
self
.
clients
=
{}
# variable -> apply -> ninputs
self
.
stale_droot
=
True
# IG: It's unclear if this is meant to be included in deployed code. It looks like
# it is unnecessary if FunctionGraph is working correctly, so I am commenting uses
# of it (for speed) but leaving the commented code in place so it is easy to restore
# for debugging purposes.
# Note: is there anything like the C preprocessor for python? It would be useful to
# just ifdef these things out
# self.debug_all_apps = set()
if
self
.
do_imports_on_attach
:
toolbox
.
Bookkeeper
.
on_attach
(
self
,
fgraph
)
def
refresh_droot_impact
(
self
):
if
self
.
stale_droot
:
self
.
droot
,
self
.
impact
,
self
.
root_destroyer
=
self
.
_build_droot_impact
()
self
.
stale_droot
=
False
return
self
.
droot
,
self
.
impact
,
self
.
root_destroyer
def
_build_droot_impact
(
self
):
droot
=
{}
# destroyed view + nonview variables -> foundation
impact
=
{}
# destroyed nonview variable -> it + all views of it
root_destroyer
=
{}
# root -> destroyer apply
for
app
in
self
.
destroyers
:
for
output_idx
,
input_idx_list
in
app
.
op
.
destroy_map
.
items
():
if
len
(
input_idx_list
)
!=
1
:
raise
NotImplementedError
()
input_idx
=
input_idx_list
[
0
]
input
=
app
.
inputs
[
input_idx
]
input_root
=
getroot
(
input
,
self
.
view_i
)
if
input_root
in
droot
:
raise
InconsistencyError
(
"Multiple destroyers of
%
s"
%
input_root
)
droot
[
input_root
]
=
input_root
root_destroyer
[
input_root
]
=
app
#input_impact = set([input_root])
#add_impact(input_root, self.view_o, input_impact)
input_impact
=
get_impact
(
input_root
,
self
.
view_o
)
for
v
in
input_impact
:
assert
v
not
in
droot
droot
[
v
]
=
input_root
impact
[
input_root
]
=
input_impact
impact
[
input_root
]
.
add
(
input_root
)
return
droot
,
impact
,
root_destroyer
def
on_detach
(
self
,
fgraph
):
if
fgraph
is
not
self
.
fgraph
:
raise
Exception
(
"detaching wrong fgraph"
,
fgraph
)
del
self
.
destroyers
del
self
.
view_i
del
self
.
view_o
del
self
.
clients
del
self
.
stale_droot
assert
self
.
fgraph
.
destroyer_handler
is
self
delattr
(
self
.
fgraph
,
'destroyers'
)
delattr
(
self
.
fgraph
,
'destroy_handler'
)
self
.
fgraph
=
None
def
on_import
(
self
,
fgraph
,
app
):
"""Add Apply instance to set which must be computed"""
#if app in self.debug_all_apps: raise ProtocolError("double import")
#self.debug_all_apps.add(app)
#print 'DH IMPORT', app, id(app), id(self), len(self.debug_all_apps)
# If it's a destructive op, add it to our watch list
if
getattr
(
app
.
op
,
'destroy_map'
,
{}):
self
.
destroyers
.
add
(
app
)
# add this symbol to the forward and backward maps
for
o_idx
,
i_idx_list
in
getattr
(
app
.
op
,
'view_map'
,
{})
.
items
():
if
len
(
i_idx_list
)
>
1
:
raise
NotImplementedError
(
'destroying this output invalidates multiple inputs'
,
(
app
.
op
))
o
=
app
.
outputs
[
o_idx
]
i
=
app
.
inputs
[
i_idx_list
[
0
]]
self
.
view_i
[
o
]
=
i
self
.
view_o
.
setdefault
(
i
,
set
())
.
add
(
o
)
# update self.clients
for
i
,
input
in
enumerate
(
app
.
inputs
):
self
.
clients
.
setdefault
(
input
,
{})
.
setdefault
(
app
,
0
)
self
.
clients
[
input
][
app
]
+=
1
for
i
,
output
in
enumerate
(
app
.
outputs
):
self
.
clients
.
setdefault
(
output
,
{})
self
.
stale_droot
=
True
def
on_prune
(
self
,
fgraph
,
app
):
"""Remove Apply instance from set which must be computed"""
#if app not in self.debug_all_apps: raise ProtocolError("prune without import")
#self.debug_all_apps.remove(app)
#UPDATE self.clients
for
i
,
input
in
enumerate
(
set
(
app
.
inputs
)):
del
self
.
clients
[
input
][
app
]
if
getattr
(
app
.
op
,
'destroy_map'
,
{}):
self
.
destroyers
.
remove
(
app
)
# Note: leaving empty client dictionaries in the struct.
# Why? It's a pain to remove them. I think they aren't doing any harm, they will be
# deleted on_detach().
#UPDATE self.view_i, self.view_o
for
o_idx
,
i_idx_list
in
getattr
(
app
.
op
,
'view_map'
,
{})
.
items
():
if
len
(
i_idx_list
)
>
1
:
#destroying this output invalidates multiple inputs
raise
NotImplementedError
()
o
=
app
.
outputs
[
o_idx
]
i
=
app
.
inputs
[
i_idx_list
[
0
]]
del
self
.
view_i
[
o
]
self
.
view_o
[
i
]
.
remove
(
o
)
if
not
self
.
view_o
[
i
]:
del
self
.
view_o
[
i
]
self
.
stale_droot
=
True
def
on_change_input
(
self
,
fgraph
,
app
,
i
,
old_r
,
new_r
):
"""app.inputs[i] changed from old_r to new_r """
if
app
==
'output'
:
# app == 'output' is special key that means FunctionGraph is redefining which nodes are being
# considered 'outputs' of the graph.
pass
else
:
#if app not in self.debug_all_apps: raise ProtocolError("change without import")
#UPDATE self.clients
self
.
clients
[
old_r
][
app
]
-=
1
if
self
.
clients
[
old_r
][
app
]
==
0
:
del
self
.
clients
[
old_r
][
app
]
self
.
clients
.
setdefault
(
new_r
,{})
.
setdefault
(
app
,
0
)
self
.
clients
[
new_r
][
app
]
+=
1
#UPDATE self.view_i, self.view_o
for
o_idx
,
i_idx_list
in
getattr
(
app
.
op
,
'view_map'
,
{})
.
items
():
if
len
(
i_idx_list
)
>
1
:
#destroying this output invalidates multiple inputs
raise
NotImplementedError
()
i_idx
=
i_idx_list
[
0
]
output
=
app
.
outputs
[
o_idx
]
if
i_idx
==
i
:
if
app
.
inputs
[
i_idx
]
is
not
new_r
:
raise
ProtocolError
(
"wrong new_r on change"
)
self
.
view_i
[
output
]
=
new_r
self
.
view_o
[
old_r
]
.
remove
(
output
)
if
not
self
.
view_o
[
old_r
]:
del
self
.
view_o
[
old_r
]
self
.
view_o
.
setdefault
(
new_r
,
set
())
.
add
(
output
)
self
.
stale_droot
=
True
def
validate
(
self
,
fgraph
):
"""Return None
Raise InconsistencyError when
a) orderings() raises an error
b) orderings cannot be topologically sorted.
"""
if
self
.
destroyers
:
ords
=
self
.
orderings
(
fgraph
)
if
_contains_cycle
(
fgraph
,
ords
):
raise
InconsistencyError
(
"Dependency graph contains cycles"
)
else
:
#James's Conjecture:
#If there are no destructive ops, then there can be no cycles.
pass
return
True
def
orderings
(
self
,
fgraph
):
"""Return orderings induced by destructive operations.
Raise InconsistencyError when
a) attempting to destroy indestructable variable, or
b) attempting to destroy a value multiple times, or
c) an Apply destroys (illegally) one of its own inputs by aliasing
"""
rval
=
{}
if
self
.
destroyers
:
# BUILD DATA STRUCTURES
# CHECK for multiple destructions during construction of variables
droot
,
impact
,
__ignore
=
self
.
refresh_droot_impact
()
# check for destruction of constants
illegal_destroy
=
[
r
for
r
in
droot
if
\
getattr
(
r
.
tag
,
'indestructible'
,
False
)
or
\
isinstance
(
r
,
graph
.
Constant
)]
if
illegal_destroy
:
#print 'destroying illegally'
raise
InconsistencyError
(
"Attempting to destroy indestructible variables:
%
s"
%
illegal_destroy
)
# add destroyed variable clients as computational dependencies
for
app
in
self
.
destroyers
:
# for each destroyed input...
for
output_idx
,
input_idx_list
in
app
.
op
.
destroy_map
.
items
():
destroyed_idx
=
input_idx_list
[
0
]
destroyed_variable
=
app
.
inputs
[
destroyed_idx
]
root
=
droot
[
destroyed_variable
]
root_impact
=
impact
[
root
]
# we generally want to put all clients of things which depend on root
# as pre-requisites of app.
# But, app is itself one such client!
# App will always be a client of the node we're destroying
# (destroyed_variable, but the tricky thing is when it is also a client of
# *another variable* viewing on the root. Generally this is illegal, (e.g.,
# add_inplace(x, x.T). In some special cases though, the in-place op will
# actually be able to work properly with multiple destroyed inputs (e.g,
# add_inplace(x, x). An Op that can still work in this case should declare
# so via the 'destroyhandler_tolerate_same' attribute or
# 'destroyhandler_tolerate_aliased' attribute.
#
# destroyhandler_tolerate_same should be a list of pairs of the form
# [(idx0, idx1), (idx0, idx2), ...]
# The first element of each pair is the input index of a destroyed
# variable.
# The second element of each pair is the index of a different input where
# we will permit exactly the same variable to appear.
# For example, add_inplace.tolerate_same might be [(0,1)] if the destroyed
# input is also allowed to appear as the second argument.
#
# destroyhandler_tolerate_aliased is the same sort of list of
# pairs.
# op.destroyhandler_tolerate_aliased = [(idx0, idx1)] tells the
# destroyhandler to IGNORE an aliasing between a destroyed
# input idx0 and another input idx1.
# This is generally a bad idea, but it is safe in some
# cases, such as
# - the op reads from the aliased idx1 before modifying idx0
# - the idx0 and idx1 are guaranteed not to overlap (e.g.
# they are pointed at different rows of a matrix).
#
#CHECK FOR INPUT ALIASING
# OPT: pre-compute this on import
tolerate_same
=
getattr
(
app
.
op
,
'destroyhandler_tolerate_same'
,
[])
tolerated
=
set
(
idx1
for
idx0
,
idx1
in
tolerate_same
if
idx0
==
destroyed_idx
)
tolerated
.
add
(
destroyed_idx
)
tolerate_aliased
=
getattr
(
app
.
op
,
'destroyhandler_tolerate_aliased'
,
[])
ignored
=
set
(
idx1
for
idx0
,
idx1
in
tolerate_aliased
if
idx0
==
destroyed_idx
)
#print 'tolerated', tolerated
#print 'ignored', ignored
for
i
,
input
in
enumerate
(
app
.
inputs
):
if
i
in
ignored
:
continue
if
input
in
root_impact
\
and
(
i
not
in
tolerated
or
input
is
not
destroyed_variable
):
raise
InconsistencyError
(
"Input aliasing:
%
s (
%
i,
%
i)"
%
(
app
,
destroyed_idx
,
i
))
# add the rule: app must be preceded by all other Apply instances that
# depend on destroyed_input
root_clients
=
set
()
for
r
in
root_impact
:
assert
not
[
a
for
a
,
c
in
self
.
clients
[
r
]
.
items
()
if
not
c
]
root_clients
.
update
([
a
for
a
,
c
in
self
.
clients
[
r
]
.
items
()
if
c
])
root_clients
.
remove
(
app
)
if
root_clients
:
rval
[
app
]
=
root_clients
return
rval
class
IncrementalDestroyHandler
(
toolbox
.
Bookkeeper
):
"""
The DestroyHandler class detects when a graph is impossible to evaluate because of
aliasing and destructive operations.
...
...
@@ -578,3 +939,4 @@ class DestroyHandler(toolbox.Bookkeeper):
return
rval
DestroyHandler
=
IncrementalDestroyHandler
编写
预览
Markdown
格式
0%
重试
或
添加新文件
添加附件
取消
您添加了
0
人
到此讨论。请谨慎行事。
请先完成此评论的编辑!
取消
请
注册
或者
登录
后发表评论