Refactor baseclass ScalarInnerGraphOp from Composite Op

pytensor/scalar/basic.py

@@ -3986,7 +3986,150 @@ class ComplexFromPolar(BinaryScalarOp):
 complex_from_polar = ComplexFromPolar(name="complex_from_polar")
 
 
-class Composite(ScalarOp, HasInnerGraph):
+class ScalarInnerGraphOp(ScalarOp, HasInnerGraph):
+    """Includes boilerplate code for Python and C-implementation of Scalar Ops with inner graph."""
+
+    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
+        self.prepare_node_called = set()
+
+    @property
+    def fn(self):
+        return None
+
+    @property
+    def inner_inputs(self):
+        return self.fgraph.inputs
+
+    @property
+    def inner_outputs(self):
+        return self.fgraph.outputs
+
+    @property
+    def py_perform_fn(self):
+        if hasattr(self, "_py_perform_fn"):
+            return self._py_perform_fn
+
+        from pytensor.link.utils import fgraph_to_python
+
+        def python_convert(op, node=None, **kwargs):
+            assert node is not None
+
+            n_outs = len(node.outputs)
+
+            if n_outs > 1:
+
+                def _perform(*inputs, outputs=[[None]] * n_outs):
+                    op.perform(node, inputs, outputs)
+                    return tuple(o[0] for o in outputs)
+
+            else:
+
+                def _perform(*inputs, outputs=[[None]]):
+                    op.perform(node, inputs, outputs)
+                    return outputs[0][0]
+
+            return _perform
+
+        self._py_perform_fn = fgraph_to_python(self.fgraph, python_convert)
+        return self._py_perform_fn
+
+    def impl(self, *inputs):
+        output_storage = [[None] for i in range(self.nout)]
+        self.perform(None, inputs, output_storage)
+        ret = to_return_values([storage[0] for storage in output_storage])
+        if self.nout > 1:
+            ret = tuple(ret)
+        return ret
+
+    def c_code_cache_version(self):
+        rval = list(self.c_code_cache_version_outer())
+        for x in self.fgraph.toposort():
+            xv = x.op.c_code_cache_version()
+            if xv:
+                rval.append(xv)
+            else:
+                return ()
+        return tuple(rval)
+
+    def c_header_dirs(self, **kwargs):
+        rval = sum(
+            (subnode.op.c_header_dirs(**kwargs) for subnode in self.fgraph.toposort()),
+            [],
+        )
+        return rval
+
+    def c_support_code(self, **kwargs):
+        # Remove duplicate code blocks by using a `set`
+        rval = {
+            subnode.op.c_support_code(**kwargs).strip()
+            for subnode in self.fgraph.toposort()
+        }
+        return "\n".join(sorted(rval))
+
+    def c_support_code_apply(self, node, name):
+        rval = []
+        for subnode, subnodename in zip(self.fgraph.toposort(), self.nodenames):
+            subnode_support_code = subnode.op.c_support_code_apply(
+                subnode, subnodename % dict(nodename=name)
+            )
+            if subnode_support_code:
+                rval.append(subnode_support_code)
+        # there should be no need to remove duplicate code blocks because
+        # each block should have been specialized for the given nodename.
+        # Any block that isn't specialized should be returned via
+        # c_support_code instead of c_support_code_apply.
+        return "\n".join(rval)
+
+    def prepare_node(self, node, storage_map, compute_map, impl):
+        if impl not in self.prepare_node_called:
+            for n in list_of_nodes(self.inputs, self.outputs):
+                n.op.prepare_node(n, None, None, impl)
+            self.prepare_node_called.add(impl)
+
+    def __eq__(self, other):
+        if self is other:
+            return True
+        if (
+            type(self) != type(other)
+            or self.nin != other.nin
+            or self.nout != other.nout
+        ):
+            return False
+
+        # TODO FIXME: Why this?  Shouldn't we expect equivalent inputs to this
+        # object to generate the same `_c_code`?
+        return self.c_code_template == other.c_code_template
+
+    def __hash__(self):
+        # Note that in general, the configparser settings at the time
+        # of code generation (__init__) affect the semantics of this Op.
+        # This function assumes that all relevant info about the configparser
+        # is embodied in _c_code.  So the _c_code, rather than self.fgraph,
+        # is the signature of the semantics of this Op.
+        # _c_code is preserved through unpickling, so the Op will not change
+        # semantics when it is reloaded with different configparser
+        # settings.
+        #
+        # TODO FIXME: Doesn't the above just mean that we should be including
+        # the relevant "configparser settings" here?  Also, why should we even
+        # care about the exact form of the generated C code when comparing
+        # `Op`s?  All this smells of leaky concerns and interfaces.
+        return hash((type(self), self.nin, self.nout, self.c_code_template))
+
+    def __getstate__(self):
+        rval = dict(self.__dict__)
+        rval.pop("_c_code", None)
+        rval.pop("_py_perform_fn", None)
+        rval.pop("_fgraph", None)
+        rval.pop("prepare_node_called", None)
+        return rval
+
+    def __setstate__(self, d):
+        self.__dict__.update(d)
+        self.prepare_node_called = set()
+
+
+class Composite(ScalarInnerGraphOp):
     """
     Composite is an Op that takes a graph of scalar operations and
     produces c code for the whole graph. Its purpose is to implement loop
@@ -4043,19 +4186,7 @@ class Composite(ScalarOp, HasInnerGraph):
         self.outputs_type = tuple([output.type for output in outputs])
         self.nin = len(inputs)
         self.nout = len(outputs)
-        self.prepare_node_called = set()
-
-    @property
-    def fn(self):
-        return None
-
-    @property
-    def inner_inputs(self):
-        return self.fgraph.inputs
-
-    @property
-    def inner_outputs(self):
-        return self.fgraph.outputs
+        super().__init__()
 
     def __str__(self):
         return self.name
@@ -4076,35 +4207,6 @@ class Composite(ScalarOp, HasInnerGraph):
         super(Composite, out).__init__(output_types_preference, name)
         return out
 
-    @property
-    def py_perform(self):
-        if hasattr(self, "_py_perform_fn"):
-            return self._py_perform_fn
-
-        from pytensor.link.utils import fgraph_to_python
-
-        def python_convert(op, node=None, **kwargs):
-            assert node is not None
-
-            n_outs = len(node.outputs)
-
-            if n_outs > 1:
-
-                def _perform(*inputs, outputs=[[None]] * n_outs):
-                    op.perform(node, inputs, outputs)
-                    return tuple(o[0] for o in outputs)
-
-            else:
-
-                def _perform(*inputs, outputs=[[None]]):
-                    op.perform(node, inputs, outputs)
-                    return outputs[0][0]
-
-            return _perform
-
-        self._py_perform_fn = fgraph_to_python(self.fgraph, python_convert)
-        return self._py_perform_fn
-
     @property
     def fgraph(self):
         if hasattr(self, "_fgraph"):
@@ -4139,12 +4241,6 @@ class Composite(ScalarOp, HasInnerGraph):
         self._fgraph = fgraph
         return self._fgraph
 
-    def prepare_node(self, node, storage_map, compute_map, impl):
-        if impl not in self.prepare_node_called:
-            for n in list_of_nodes(self.inputs, self.outputs):
-                n.op.prepare_node(n, None, None, impl)
-            self.prepare_node_called.add(impl)
-
     def clone_float32(self):
         # This will not modify the fgraph or the nodes
         new_ins, new_outs = composite_f32.apply(self.fgraph)
@@ -4155,8 +4251,6 @@ class Composite(ScalarOp, HasInnerGraph):
         return Composite(new_ins, new_outs)
 
     def output_types(self, input_types):
-        # TODO FIXME: What's the intended purpose/use of this method, and why
-        # does it even need to be a method?
         if tuple(input_types) != self.inputs_type:
             raise TypeError(
                 f"Wrong types for Composite. Expected {self.inputs_type}, got {tuple(input_types)}."
@@ -4183,63 +4277,13 @@ class Composite(ScalarOp, HasInnerGraph):
             return node
 
     def perform(self, node, inputs, output_storage):
-        outputs = self.py_perform(*inputs)
+        outputs = self.py_perform_fn(*inputs)
         for storage, out_val in zip(output_storage, outputs):
             storage[0] = out_val
 
-    def impl(self, *inputs):
-        output_storage = [[None] for i in range(self.nout)]
-        self.perform(None, inputs, output_storage)
-        ret = to_return_values([storage[0] for storage in output_storage])
-        if self.nout > 1:
-            ret = tuple(ret)
-        return ret
-
     def grad(self, inputs, output_grads):
         raise NotImplementedError("grad is not implemented for Composite")
 
-    def __eq__(self, other):
-        if self is other:
-            return True
-        if (
-            type(self) != type(other)
-            or self.nin != other.nin
-            or self.nout != other.nout
-        ):
-            return False
-
-        # TODO FIXME: Why this?  Shouldn't we expect equivalent inputs to this
-        # object to generate the same `_c_code`?
-        return self.c_code_template == other.c_code_template
-
-    def __hash__(self):
-        # Note that in general, the configparser settings at the time
-        # of code generation (__init__) affect the semantics of this Op.
-        # This function assumes that all relevant info about the configparser
-        # is embodied in _c_code.  So the _c_code, rather than self.fgraph,
-        # is the signature of the semantics of this Op.
-        # _c_code is preserved through unpickling, so the Op will not change
-        # semantics when it is reloaded with different configparser
-        # settings.
-        #
-        # TODO FIXME: Doesn't the above just mean that we should be including
-        # the relevant "configparser settings" here?  Also, why should we even
-        # care about the exact form of the generated C code when comparing
-        # `Op`s?  All this smells of leaky concerns and interfaces.
-        return hash((type(self), self.nin, self.nout, self.c_code_template))
-
-    def __getstate__(self):
-        rval = dict(self.__dict__)
-        rval.pop("_c_code", None)
-        rval.pop("_py_perform_fn", None)
-        rval.pop("_fgraph", None)
-        rval.pop("prepare_node_called", None)
-        return rval
-
-    def __setstate__(self, d):
-        self.__dict__.update(d)
-        self.prepare_node_called = set()
-
     @property
     def c_code_template(self):
         from pytensor.link.c.interface import CLinkerType
@@ -4317,44 +4361,8 @@ class Composite(ScalarOp, HasInnerGraph):
 
         return self.c_code_template % d
 
-    def c_code_cache_version(self):
-        rval = [3]
-        for x in self.fgraph.toposort():
-            xv = x.op.c_code_cache_version()
-            if xv:
-                rval.append(xv)
-            else:
-                return ()
-        return tuple(rval)
-
-    def c_header_dirs(self, **kwargs):
-        rval = sum(
-            (subnode.op.c_header_dirs(**kwargs) for subnode in self.fgraph.toposort()),
-            [],
-        )
-        return rval
-
-    def c_support_code(self, **kwargs):
-        # Remove duplicate code blocks by using a `set`
-        rval = {
-            subnode.op.c_support_code(**kwargs).strip()
-            for subnode in self.fgraph.toposort()
-        }
-        return "\n".join(sorted(rval))
-
-    def c_support_code_apply(self, node, name):
-        rval = []
-        for subnode, subnodename in zip(self.fgraph.toposort(), self.nodenames):
-            subnode_support_code = subnode.op.c_support_code_apply(
-                subnode, subnodename % dict(nodename=name)
-            )
-            if subnode_support_code:
-                rval.append(subnode_support_code)
-        # there should be no need to remove duplicate code blocks because
-        # each block should have been specialized for the given nodename.
-        # Any block that isn't specialized should be returned via
-        # c_support_code instead of c_support_code_apply.
-        return "\n".join(rval)
+    def c_code_cache_version_outer(self) -> Tuple[int, ...]:
+        return (3,)
 
 
 class Compositef32: